An astronomer would say, what we are seeing unfold in the political arena in the USA is a dance of the galaxies, a Male Alpha tango. Two titans locked eyes in the gilded corridors of power politics. It is not a candlelight setting with sunset at the far horizon, but infinitely more romantic settings of Twitter, campaign trails, boardrooms, loudmouth, bombastic, almost a gunslinger interviews.
THE TWO SIDES OF ROMANCE.
On one side, you can pick sides, DJ Trump, orange-hued demigod of populism, real estate mogul turned statesman turned politician, elected president and then banned, now celebrated and maybe soon to be banned on Twitter, phoenix. And on the other side is E Musk, the Martian dreamer, electric evangelist, multi-billionaire, a strategic free speech quick to react and freshly minted landlord of social media hellscapes.
Their romance–sorry, strategic alignment of unstated vested interests and ambitions was brief, chaotic, and utterly doomed from the moment they locked their hands. But what an electrifying combustion of egos it has been on a flight to make America great Again that is bursting like the unmanned rockets.
THE INDICATORS
In Jungian psychology, which focuses on the integration of the conscious and unconscious minds to achieve self-actualisation, this is a minor blip. An expected collision of dominant archetypes – the Warrior-King (DJ Trump) and the Magician-Visionary (E. Musk), which tends to cause psychic friction rather than collective shared initiatives. There’s no room in a self-driving Tesla for two people yelling, “I drive!” Especially not when both claim they invented the steering wheel.
The organisational behaviour theory would classify these two warlords of public infighting as “Type Triple-A Personalities” — Aggressive, Adventurous, and Allergic to interdependence and collaboration. Individually, they may be visionaries —at least one has doubts about being labelled as such. Together, they’re like trying to lead a management retreat with a lion and a shark – in the same imaginary flight.
Trump is a master of grandiose self-presentation and narrative control, found a soulmate in Musk’s disruptive innovation complex. Both suffer from acute spotlight dependency and chronic Twitter Tourette’s, flaring up at any moment with a 3 a.m. tweet or a rocket launch that shouts, “Hey, look at me!”
Their early public exchanges were on the expected lines. Flirtatiously ambiguous: compliments masked as provocations, retweets as love letters, and unsubtle power plays disguised as ideological alignment. At some point, Elon promised and reinstated Trump’s Twitter account, handing over your house keys after two dates. Trump gave Musk nods that were warmer than his usual Arctic scorn.
But as every management consultant worth their strategic dossier with two-by-two matrices and over-crowded, unrecognisable presentation sheets will tell you, this was a textbook case of co-dependent ego expansion disorder. Each man believed he was the alpha change-agent in the room. Unfortunately, the room only had one mirror that both wanted to shout their desired response to who was the best alpha change agent.
Their inevitable implosion was majestic and unavoidable. The tipping point came when Elon started dabbling in politics, diversifying his verticals, and making unmasked, musty comments about voting red, blue, and possibly a new colour, depending on the state of Dogecoin that day. Trump, never one to outsource or solicit opinions, publicly tried to remind Elon who the real ringmaster was. In MAGA-speak: “He came to me on his knees, begging for help, but I was not willing to oblige with a cigar.”
Classic ex talk. Both looked as if they were auditioning for the Rapido ad – I Broke Up.
It was a downward spiral of a gigantic nature. Elon took subtle jabs. Trump responded with statements more embroidered and medalled than the military uniform of a recently failed army general of a terror-supporting nation. And just like that, the great bromance turned into a cautionary tale of executive dysfunction and incompatible ego architecture.
From a strategic alliance perspective, it was doomed from day zero.
Both operate within the founder-CEO paradigm, where consensus is a four-letter word and feedback is perceived as a personal insult. Their shared narcissistic traits, while initially aligning like constellations of mutual flattery, quickly became black holes consuming each other’s glory.
In simpler terms, the mirage of a collaboration was equivalent to putting two extremely dominant peacocks in a cage and expecting a swan song.
Maybe it could have worked like any other failed romance.
Maybe, if one of them had undergone empathy off-site training, a basic intro to humility or a session on Brand-I, but seriously: these men aren’t built to share stage time, let alone vision boards.
And yet, it was sheer high-voltage entertainment while the circus was on. Maybe, the after-play will be as adventurous and satisfying. Their public spat was the management case study of the decade, with a touch of daytime soap, reality TV, and ancient Greek tragedy. The loser- the citizen of USA and global economy.
In closing, what have we learned?
Absolutely nothing.
However, I have been able to deploy a few terms from psychology, referenced misunderstood Carl Jung, and cited business strategy models from a dictionary that are no longer relevant beyond an outdated deck. I must say, writing this felt strangely right, like catharsis in a boardroom with a karaoke mike.
Do I know what any of it means?
Not really.
But it is therapeutic and borderline academic for a Gen Sixty… and that matters in today’s world of performative intellect.
I raise my cup of freshly brewed coffee and see the Glass of my favourite Chayos Pre-mix masala looking at me with knotted brows. Oh, that will be another writing some other time.
BLOG/ 040/1099/608 To connect, send an email . Twitter S_kotnala
