India’s Corporate Social Responsibility framework is decades old. It has channelled thousands of crores into social development. Yet, despite good intentions and notable successes, one uncomfortable question remains: CSR ROI.
Are we funding change, or merely funding projects?
I hope people know that this distinction matters for people and the nation.
As expected, a significant share of CSR spending and CSR ROI continues to be measured through a corporate lens. Projects are often rightly selected because they can be linked, directly or indirectly, to the company’s geography, industry, customer base, supply chain, employee engagement agenda or brand narrative. While such alignment may satisfy governance, corporate objectives and reporting requirements, it does not necessarily serve India’s most urgent long-term developmental needs.
The nation does not need more six-nine or twelve-month projects. It needs longer commitments; one could very well start with a span of 5 years, but it’s best to go for 10 years or more. Twenty-year commitments with all legal and performance matrices.
The recent upheaval in the global development sector should serve as a warning. The sudden dismantling of USAID programmes and sharp cuts in international cooperation budgets across several European countries have sent shockwaves through the NGO ecosystem worldwide. Hundreds of programmes have halted abruptly. Millions have lost access to education, healthcare and livelihood support. It’s a nightmare for development experts, who warn that years of progress in education, women’s rights and community resilience may be reversed and be tough to recover from.
India has also not remained insulated from these tremors.
Many Indian NGOs have historically depended on international funding, and over the last few years, tighter regulations, licence conditions, and increased compliance requirements have significantly reduced the flow of foreign funds into the sector. Whether one agrees with these regulatory changes or not, the outcome is undeniable*. Thousands of organisations have been forced to scale down, restructure or close programmes.
The result is a widening development funding gap that is hugely problematic.
Corporate India can either view this as somebody else’s problem or recognise it as a national challenge requiring a national response. While corporations routinely make strategic investments spanning five, ten or even twenty years, they often expect social transformation to happen within six to twelve months.
A village school cannot be transformed in nine months.
A community’s trust cannot be built in twelve months.
Women’s economic empowerment cannot be measured over a single reporting cycle.
Early childhood education cannot demonstrate its full impact before a child has even reached middle school.
Yet project after project is approved for one year, cautiously renewed, modified midway, and evaluated against metrics that often prioritise activity over outcomes. It’s like asking for sugarcane juice before planting the crop!
This approach creates exactly the opposite of what CSR intends to achieve.
Communities become sceptical.
Local institutions become dependent and then abandoned.
NGO teams are repeatedly hired and laid off.
Knowledge and capabilities are lost.
Trust erodes.
Development does not happen through projects.
Development happens through relationships.
Infrastructure matters. Capacity matters. But trust matters most.
And trust requires continuity.
Corporate India must therefore begin viewing CSR through a broader lens of national return on investment. Not just another area for the company’s return on investment.
Look at CSR ROI as return on investment for India.
If quality education keeps children in school, society benefits.
If women become economically independent, society benefits.
If communities become more resilient, society benefits.
If young people acquire employable skills, society benefits.
These outcomes may not immediately feed back into a company’s sales funnel, recruitment pipeline or reputation metrics. Yet they create the stable, prosperous and productive nation upon which every business ultimately depends.
Another uncomfortable truth must also be acknowledged.
Many corporations demand world-class governance, reporting, technology adoption, impact measurement, and compliance from NGOs while refusing to adequately fund the systems required to deliver these functions.
No corporation expects its employees to work without HR, finance, technology, training, administration, legal support or leadership development.
Why should they expect NGOs to do so?
The sector’s chronic underinvestment in building organisational capability has weakened its effectiveness for decades and, in turn, the CSR ROI.
The corporate and other sponsors of projects treat administrative expenses as waste and sometimes invisible rather than an investment. Capacity building is viewed as optional and a luxury rather than essential.
This mindset needs to change.
For new projects, there is a strong case for allowing up to 30 per cent of project budgets to be allocated towards institutional strengthening, talent development, technology, monitoring systems and administrative capability.
Strong organisations and capabilities create strong outcomes.
Over time, as partnerships mature and systems stabilise, this proportion can gradually decline.
Government policy could also recognise this reality. New projects and emerging organisations may require higher administrative ratios in their early years. Long-standing projects with proven systems and established relationships can be subjected to progressively tighter efficiency benchmarks after five or more years of continuous engagement.
This would create incentives for both effectiveness and sustainability.
India’s NGO/CSR sector should not be viewed merely as an implementation agency for mandated and corporate-aligned CSR spending. It is a strategic national asset. It operates in areas where markets do not function. Though it may not do what a government initiative could, it reaches where governments cannot always reach effectively and where immediate commercial returns do not exist.
The question before Corporate India is therefore larger than compliance.
Do we want CSR to remain an annual expenditure exercise? Or do we want it to become one of the most powerful nation-building investments independent India has ever seen?
The answer will determine whether the next decade of CSR and CSR ROI creates reports or creates history.
BLOG/048/2026/666/1211 To connect, send an email . Twitter S_kotnala
The image used is AI (Gemini) generated and was first used by mxmindia.com, where the article first appeared
You may want to read
The Real Cost of Impact: Why CSR and NGO Projects Need Higher Management Fees.
CSR TEAM CAPABILITY BUILDING – Non-Negotiable
