“Does a story have to be true?” Not necessarily. It has to look and feel true. That distinction is at the heart of Drishyam 3: The Conclusion, and perhaps of storytelling itself. As the film reminds us, words create visuals, and visuals create the narrative. Once the visual has been created convincingly enough, we don’t merely see it—we begin to believe it.
There is a little Osho in that thought. Truth, after all, is not always what happened; often, it is what we have come to believe happened. Reality may be one thing, our perception another, and the story we construct around it yet another. Drishyam has always lived in that fascinating gap. The third film simply takes us deeper into it.
Vijay Salgaonkar is back, and Ajay Devgn slips into the character with the ease of someone returning to a familiar house. He doesn’t overplay Vijay. He doesn’t need to. A pause, a look, a calculated silence—and you know another thought is running somewhere behind that expression.
But this time, Vijay gets a worthy opponent. Jaideep Ahlawat, as Rajveer Tomar, brings a different kind of intelligence and energy to the game. Their face-off gives the film much of its tension. Tabu, Shriya Saran, Prakash Raj, Rajat Kapoor and the rest of the ensemble add their own pieces to a puzzle that could easily have become repetitive by the third outing. That’s the real achievement.
Drishyam 3 is not simply about finding another twist. The audience has already been trained to distrust what it sees. So the filmmakers have a tougher job: they have to make us question our own conclusions. Abhishek Pathak and his writing team understand this game well. They build situations where the image in front of us keeps changing depending on what we know, what we don’t know and, most importantly, what we have been made to believe.
And this is where the film becomes more than a thriller. Words create visuals. Visuals create narrative. Narrative creates belief. And belief can become our version of truth. That is a powerful idea to build a film around.
Of course, you can occasionally stop and say, “Really?” Some plot conveniences may invite that response. But then, isn’t that also the contract we make with cinema? We don’t demand that every story be true. We demand that, for those two-and-a-half hours, it feel true.
That requires teamwork, and Drishyam 3 is a true team achievement. The writing, direction, performances, editing, cinematography, sound, and background score work together rather than trying to announce themselves individually. The film understands that suspense is not created merely by hiding information. It is created by controlling when, how and through whose eyes we receive it.
And then comes the climax. No spoilers. Let the film do its work.
What I enjoyed most about Drishyam 3 is that it respects its audience’s intelligence while still knowing audiences love to be fooled. It doesn’t merely ask, “Can you guess what happens?” It asks a more interesting question: “What made you believe what you believed?”
That, for me, is the real Drishyam trick.
The story may not always be true. But it is convincing enough to make you forget that it isn’t.
Watch it. Not just for Vijay Salgaonkar’s final game, but for the sheer pleasure of watching a bunch of good filmmakers, actors, and technicians collectively manufacture belief.
BLOG/068/2026/677/1230 To connect, Twitter S_kotnala
